Lord Goldsmith, Att.Gen. of U.K. mute in threatened murder
Link to Attorney General of the U.K., Lord Goldsmith: http://www.lslo.gov.uk/
The letters below are self-explanatory. It illustrates how the secret cults freemasons and its younger criminal organisation the pyrates have perverted the criminal justice system in the United Kingdom.
If the Attorney General of a first-world, civilised nation that gave us the Magna Carte shies away from his responsiblities in a case of at least ten criminal offences committed (including threatening my life with a six-inch blade knife) against the prevailing law of the state, then you wonder what is left of the criminal justice system.
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
13 June 2005
For the personal attention of the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith QC.
Lord Goldsmith QC.
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SW1
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 44110350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. OVADJE with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
Thank you sir for your letter of 10th June 2005.
From your letter, you do not have the power either as the Attorney General or as a lawyer (who is a friend of the law with public interest watchdog function) to make a phone call and request (not order) of the police authorities or its supervisory bodies, that any errors in the investigation of my case (or any case for that matter) be corrected.
The last line of the second paragraph of your letter states In particular, he does not have the power to initiate a police investigation. I feel this is misleading. I asked for you to request that errors be amended and more evidence taken at a scene of a crime, not initiate an investigation.
I believe it is the norm for prosecuting attorneys to demand more evidence etc. of the police so as to improve chances of a successful prosecution. The police in such cases may return to the scene of crime for more evidence, sometimes years after an incident. Attorneys have sometimes demanded the exhumation of bodies long buried, so as to improve the chances of prosecution.
Let us imagine that (GOD forbid) somebody assaulted the Prime Minister and pressed a knife against his throat in London. From you letter, the Attorney General would simply continue as if nothing happened and leave it to the police. Whether there is a prosecution or not would not be his responsibility! I believe not. Rather, after waiting for sometime, he would phone the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and enquire why the delay in prosecution and request that the scene be photographed and the forensic team, more eye- witness accounts obtained etc. to improve the chances of a successful prosecution.
From your letter, in effect, any man can murder successfully in the United Kingdom. All one need do is bribe the investigating officer(s). They will DELIBERATELY botch the investigation. When the victim’s relatives complain, the Attorney General can refer them to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Whilst the IPCC may punish the officers, the murder will never be investigated. After serving whatever punishment, the policemen can enjoy their booty.
A surgeon refuses to operate on a patient. Instead of saving the life of the patient first, before investigating the conduct of the surgeon, by your position, doctors can let the patient die. Later, the Attorney General can refer the dead patient’s relatives to pursue the conduct of the surgeon at the General Medical Council.
I believe the law did not intend the police to be a law unto itself, which is what the second paragraph of your letter implies. I believe spirit of the law intended liasing between the Attorney General and the Police. The same way a surgeon requests that instruments be sterilised properly by the nursing staff so that he may operate, so the Attorney General can request further evidence or statements etc. to improve the chances of prosecution.
To claim that a rigid line separates your office and the police is to defeat the spirit of the law and defeat justice before it reaches the courts. I feel it is shying away from responsibility. The question is why?
I believe that your action (or lack of it) is not tenable in law. And even if it were, it means that a loophole exists in existing statutes for the police to deliberately perverse the course of justice. If that were the case, then one would have expected you to act with despatch to expose such a deficit with the involvement of other institutions (e.g. cabinet, parliament, academia) to find a remedy in the short term and initiate statutes to plug such loophole in the long term. I have not been informed that you have done either.
Whilst I do not demand perfection from any human, well, your silence not only about my case but future cases of calculated perversion of justice, to me, means that you are satisfied with the current state of affairs. I feel disappointed about such position.
If my assailant Sarah had murdered me with that knife (GOD forbid), my aged mother would certainly have come to the U.K. from Nigeria. You would have told her go to the IPCC, I cannot phone the police that the murder of your son be properly investigated and any errors amended.
The bible describes an olive tree as a blessing both to God and man. Its oil is used for the worship of God and in the healing and feeding of man.
Sir, the question for you to ask yourself is: Am I an olive tree? Are my actions a blessing unto God and to man? If they are, then feel free to continue. If they are not, then ask yourself: should I reconsider my position as Attorney General?
I leave you with these questions.
I would like to let you know that my trust in the Lord Jesus is unshakeable. It is not over until Jesus says so. I have always overcome through HIS power and HE has never failed to clear my path of all obstacles as stated in Matthew Chapter 15 verse 13 every plant, which my Heavenly Father hath not planted will be uprooted.
God bless you.
Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
48 Courtland Avenue • ILFORD • iG1 3DW.
United Kingdom
........................................................................................................................................................................
General enquiries 020 -7271 2400 Direct line 020 – 7271 2486 E-mail: chris.simson@islo.x.gsi.gov.uk
THE LEGAL SECRETARIAT TO THE LAW OFFICERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS
9 BUCKINGHAM GATE
LONDON SW1E 6JP
10 June 2005
THIS IS A TEXT COPY OF THE LETTER FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.K.
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue
Ilford
IG1 3DW
Dear Dr. Ovadje:
Thank you for your letters of 23 May and 3 June, to the Attorney General. I have been asked to reply.
My colleague Tim Streven’s letter of 5 May advised you to take up your complaints against the police with the local force, and failing that, with the Independent Police Complaints Commission. This was correct advice.
The police are responsible for investigating allegations of crime. Following an investigation, the police may decided to: take no further action; instigate proceedings by charge or summons in certain cases; or refer the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a decision as to whether a prosecution should be brought. The Attorney superintends the CPS, as you have noted from our website, and is accountable to Parliament for their activities, but he is not involved in the decisions referred to above. In particular, he does not have the power to initiate a police investigation.
I understand the distress caused you by recent events and can only imagine how traumatic they must have been for you. This office in no way belittles that: but you are asking the Attorney General to do something which he is not simply empowered to do.
Yours sincerely,
CHRISTOPHER SIMPSON
Correspondence Unit
.........................................................................................................................................................................
DR. J. A. T. OVADJE
June 3rd 3005
Lord Goldsmith QC
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SW1E 6JP
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 4410350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
I wrote to you on the above subject on the 23rd of May 2005 and personally delivered it to your office.
I am concerned as I am yet to hear from you. The evidence of the assailant’s destruction of my room is still awaiting collection today 3rd of June , 2005; 41 days after I was assaulted, battered and threatened with death whilst a knife was pressed against my throat.
I would like to tell my children that the system works and the rule of law is sacrosanct. The reading for today in the Word, a daily prayer guide includes Matthew chapter 12 verse 33 of the bible which says Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt : for the tree is known by his fruit.
I would appreciate your reply as soon as possible.
Many thanks and God bless you.
Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
48 Courtland Avenue • Ilford • IG1 3DW
UNITED KINGDOM
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
23rd May 2005
For the personal attention of the Attorney General of the United Kingdom.
Lord Goldsmith QC
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SWIE 6JP
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 44110350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
Further to my previous letter to you, I am writing to you again on this matter. I believe you did not read my last letter. This letter and the attached package, clearly demonstrate deliberate, malicious, planned and repetitive acts by the policemen (supposed to investigate the case) that constitute criminal acts according to existing statutes.
There is no doubt that you are the Chief Law Officer in the United Kingdom From the web site of your office, I write a few excerpts on the role of your office:
1. 1.1 the Attorney General performs a varied and wide range of functions. In the discharge of their functions, the Law Officer attach the greatest importance to the principles of fairness, independence and accountability.
2. a) Legal Adviser to Government;
b) Superintending Minister;
(c) One of three Ministers responsible for the criminal justice system;
(d) Guardian of the public interest;
(e) Functions in relation to (i) Parliament and (ii) the legal profession.
3. 1.9: The Director of Public Prosecutions, Ken Macdonald QC, the head of the CPS, is appointed by, and operates under the superintendence of, the Attorney General. The Attorney General is accountable to Parliament for all matters relating to the CPS.
4. 1.17: Public interest functions: Where, on the other hand, the Attorney General acts as guardian of the public interest, he is acting in a wholly independent and quasi-judicial capacity and not as a member of the Government... In carrying out such public interest functions, the Attorney General may seek the views of Ministerial colleagues on where the public interest lies (through what is known as "the Shawcross exercise"), but ultimately the relevant decision is for him alone. All the Attorney's functions in relation to individual criminal cases fall under this head.
5. Leader of the Bar — the Attorney General has always been the Leader of the Bar ex officio. Both he and the Solicitor General attend meetings of the Bar Council, and the Attorney General chairs the Annual General Meeting of the Bar
It is my belief that from the roles of your office as above, the Attorney General cannot see a series of crimes being committed and look the other way. Even a private solicitor without a public office is a friend of the law and has a public interest watchdog function.
While the letter from Mr. Strevens refers to the Independent Police Complaints Commission a process that investigates complaints against the police, the first issue here is collection of the evidence, which then increases the chance of a successful prosecution of the assailant.
If a surgeon fails to carry out an operation, I believe the first duty is to operate the patient and save life. Then we can investigate the conduct of the surgeon. Doing the latter alone, will kill the patient even if the surgeon is found guilty.
The evidence of the assailant’s destruction of my room is still awaiting collection today 23rd of May 2005, 31 days after I was assaulted, battered and threatened with death by a knife pressed against my throat.
I would like to be able to tell my children that the system works and the rule of law is sacrosanct.
I know even a phone call from you asking that any anomalies in the investigation be corrected with a view to fruitful prosecution will suffice. I do not for any moment underestimate the power of your office.
Sir, I believe it is within your power to act to ensure that justice is done in this case. I would appreciate your necessary action.
God bless you.
Sincerely,
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue • Ilford • IG1 3DW
United Kingdom
.........................................................................................................................................................................
General enquiries: 020 7271 2400 Direct line: 020 7271 2492 Fax: 020 7271 2494
e-mail: tim.strevens@islo.x.gsi.gov.uk
THE LEGAL SECRETARIAT TO THE LAW OFFICERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS
9 BUCKINGHAM GATE
LONDON SW1E 6JP
THIS IS A TEXT COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.K.
5th May 2005
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue
Ilford
IG1 3DW
Thank you for your letter of 3rd May addressed to the Attorney General. I have been asked to reply.
I was sorry to read of the attack on yourself which I’m sure must have been a horrific experience for you.
The Attorney General is the principal legal adviser to Government, and as such cannot give legal advice or assistance to individuals. He has no role to play in relation to individual court decisions, save in particular circumstances, which do not apply here (e.g. appeals against sentences thought to be unduly lenient). He has no role to play in relation to charging decisions or the actions of the police or the Courts.
You are plainly unhappy with the way the police handled this case. If you have a complaint against the police, you should take it up with the local force. If you exhaust that process, there is an independent Police Complaints Commission:
Independent Police Complaints Commission
90 High Holborn LONDON WC1V 6BH Tel: 020 7155 3000. Fax: 020 7404 0430
enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Sincerely,
Tim Strevens
Correspondence Unit
The letters below are self-explanatory. It illustrates how the secret cults freemasons and its younger criminal organisation the pyrates have perverted the criminal justice system in the United Kingdom.
If the Attorney General of a first-world, civilised nation that gave us the Magna Carte shies away from his responsiblities in a case of at least ten criminal offences committed (including threatening my life with a six-inch blade knife) against the prevailing law of the state, then you wonder what is left of the criminal justice system.
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
13 June 2005
For the personal attention of the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith QC.
Lord Goldsmith QC.
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SW1
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 44110350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. OVADJE with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
Thank you sir for your letter of 10th June 2005.
From your letter, you do not have the power either as the Attorney General or as a lawyer (who is a friend of the law with public interest watchdog function) to make a phone call and request (not order) of the police authorities or its supervisory bodies, that any errors in the investigation of my case (or any case for that matter) be corrected.
The last line of the second paragraph of your letter states In particular, he does not have the power to initiate a police investigation. I feel this is misleading. I asked for you to request that errors be amended and more evidence taken at a scene of a crime, not initiate an investigation.
I believe it is the norm for prosecuting attorneys to demand more evidence etc. of the police so as to improve chances of a successful prosecution. The police in such cases may return to the scene of crime for more evidence, sometimes years after an incident. Attorneys have sometimes demanded the exhumation of bodies long buried, so as to improve the chances of prosecution.
Let us imagine that (GOD forbid) somebody assaulted the Prime Minister and pressed a knife against his throat in London. From you letter, the Attorney General would simply continue as if nothing happened and leave it to the police. Whether there is a prosecution or not would not be his responsibility! I believe not. Rather, after waiting for sometime, he would phone the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and enquire why the delay in prosecution and request that the scene be photographed and the forensic team, more eye- witness accounts obtained etc. to improve the chances of a successful prosecution.
From your letter, in effect, any man can murder successfully in the United Kingdom. All one need do is bribe the investigating officer(s). They will DELIBERATELY botch the investigation. When the victim’s relatives complain, the Attorney General can refer them to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Whilst the IPCC may punish the officers, the murder will never be investigated. After serving whatever punishment, the policemen can enjoy their booty.
A surgeon refuses to operate on a patient. Instead of saving the life of the patient first, before investigating the conduct of the surgeon, by your position, doctors can let the patient die. Later, the Attorney General can refer the dead patient’s relatives to pursue the conduct of the surgeon at the General Medical Council.
I believe the law did not intend the police to be a law unto itself, which is what the second paragraph of your letter implies. I believe spirit of the law intended liasing between the Attorney General and the Police. The same way a surgeon requests that instruments be sterilised properly by the nursing staff so that he may operate, so the Attorney General can request further evidence or statements etc. to improve the chances of prosecution.
To claim that a rigid line separates your office and the police is to defeat the spirit of the law and defeat justice before it reaches the courts. I feel it is shying away from responsibility. The question is why?
I believe that your action (or lack of it) is not tenable in law. And even if it were, it means that a loophole exists in existing statutes for the police to deliberately perverse the course of justice. If that were the case, then one would have expected you to act with despatch to expose such a deficit with the involvement of other institutions (e.g. cabinet, parliament, academia) to find a remedy in the short term and initiate statutes to plug such loophole in the long term. I have not been informed that you have done either.
Whilst I do not demand perfection from any human, well, your silence not only about my case but future cases of calculated perversion of justice, to me, means that you are satisfied with the current state of affairs. I feel disappointed about such position.
If my assailant Sarah had murdered me with that knife (GOD forbid), my aged mother would certainly have come to the U.K. from Nigeria. You would have told her go to the IPCC, I cannot phone the police that the murder of your son be properly investigated and any errors amended.
The bible describes an olive tree as a blessing both to God and man. Its oil is used for the worship of God and in the healing and feeding of man.
Sir, the question for you to ask yourself is: Am I an olive tree? Are my actions a blessing unto God and to man? If they are, then feel free to continue. If they are not, then ask yourself: should I reconsider my position as Attorney General?
I leave you with these questions.
I would like to let you know that my trust in the Lord Jesus is unshakeable. It is not over until Jesus says so. I have always overcome through HIS power and HE has never failed to clear my path of all obstacles as stated in Matthew Chapter 15 verse 13 every plant, which my Heavenly Father hath not planted will be uprooted.
God bless you.
Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
48 Courtland Avenue • ILFORD • iG1 3DW.
United Kingdom
........................................................................................................................................................................
General enquiries 020 -7271 2400 Direct line 020 – 7271 2486 E-mail: chris.simson@islo.x.gsi.gov.uk
THE LEGAL SECRETARIAT TO THE LAW OFFICERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS
9 BUCKINGHAM GATE
LONDON SW1E 6JP
10 June 2005
THIS IS A TEXT COPY OF THE LETTER FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.K.
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue
Ilford
IG1 3DW
Dear Dr. Ovadje:
Thank you for your letters of 23 May and 3 June, to the Attorney General. I have been asked to reply.
My colleague Tim Streven’s letter of 5 May advised you to take up your complaints against the police with the local force, and failing that, with the Independent Police Complaints Commission. This was correct advice.
The police are responsible for investigating allegations of crime. Following an investigation, the police may decided to: take no further action; instigate proceedings by charge or summons in certain cases; or refer the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a decision as to whether a prosecution should be brought. The Attorney superintends the CPS, as you have noted from our website, and is accountable to Parliament for their activities, but he is not involved in the decisions referred to above. In particular, he does not have the power to initiate a police investigation.
I understand the distress caused you by recent events and can only imagine how traumatic they must have been for you. This office in no way belittles that: but you are asking the Attorney General to do something which he is not simply empowered to do.
Yours sincerely,
CHRISTOPHER SIMPSON
Correspondence Unit
.........................................................................................................................................................................
DR. J. A. T. OVADJE
June 3rd 3005
Lord Goldsmith QC
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SW1E 6JP
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 4410350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
I wrote to you on the above subject on the 23rd of May 2005 and personally delivered it to your office.
I am concerned as I am yet to hear from you. The evidence of the assailant’s destruction of my room is still awaiting collection today 3rd of June , 2005; 41 days after I was assaulted, battered and threatened with death whilst a knife was pressed against my throat.
I would like to tell my children that the system works and the rule of law is sacrosanct. The reading for today in the Word, a daily prayer guide includes Matthew chapter 12 verse 33 of the bible which says Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt : for the tree is known by his fruit.
I would appreciate your reply as soon as possible.
Many thanks and God bless you.
Sincerely,
J. A. T. Ovadje (Dr.)
48 Courtland Avenue • Ilford • IG1 3DW
UNITED KINGDOM
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
23rd May 2005
For the personal attention of the Attorney General of the United Kingdom.
Lord Goldsmith QC
Attorney General of the United Kingdom
9 Buckingham Gate
London
SWIE 6JP
Dear Sir: Ilford police station ref: 44110350/05: battering and threatening of the life of Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje with a six-inch blade knife; acts by the police which constitute criminal offences according to existing statutes in the United Kingdom.
Further to my previous letter to you, I am writing to you again on this matter. I believe you did not read my last letter. This letter and the attached package, clearly demonstrate deliberate, malicious, planned and repetitive acts by the policemen (supposed to investigate the case) that constitute criminal acts according to existing statutes.
There is no doubt that you are the Chief Law Officer in the United Kingdom From the web site of your office, I write a few excerpts on the role of your office:
1. 1.1 the Attorney General performs a varied and wide range of functions. In the discharge of their functions, the Law Officer attach the greatest importance to the principles of fairness, independence and accountability.
2. a) Legal Adviser to Government;
b) Superintending Minister;
(c) One of three Ministers responsible for the criminal justice system;
(d) Guardian of the public interest;
(e) Functions in relation to (i) Parliament and (ii) the legal profession.
3. 1.9: The Director of Public Prosecutions, Ken Macdonald QC, the head of the CPS, is appointed by, and operates under the superintendence of, the Attorney General. The Attorney General is accountable to Parliament for all matters relating to the CPS.
4. 1.17: Public interest functions: Where, on the other hand, the Attorney General acts as guardian of the public interest, he is acting in a wholly independent and quasi-judicial capacity and not as a member of the Government... In carrying out such public interest functions, the Attorney General may seek the views of Ministerial colleagues on where the public interest lies (through what is known as "the Shawcross exercise"), but ultimately the relevant decision is for him alone. All the Attorney's functions in relation to individual criminal cases fall under this head.
5. Leader of the Bar — the Attorney General has always been the Leader of the Bar ex officio. Both he and the Solicitor General attend meetings of the Bar Council, and the Attorney General chairs the Annual General Meeting of the Bar
It is my belief that from the roles of your office as above, the Attorney General cannot see a series of crimes being committed and look the other way. Even a private solicitor without a public office is a friend of the law and has a public interest watchdog function.
While the letter from Mr. Strevens refers to the Independent Police Complaints Commission a process that investigates complaints against the police, the first issue here is collection of the evidence, which then increases the chance of a successful prosecution of the assailant.
If a surgeon fails to carry out an operation, I believe the first duty is to operate the patient and save life. Then we can investigate the conduct of the surgeon. Doing the latter alone, will kill the patient even if the surgeon is found guilty.
The evidence of the assailant’s destruction of my room is still awaiting collection today 23rd of May 2005, 31 days after I was assaulted, battered and threatened with death by a knife pressed against my throat.
I would like to be able to tell my children that the system works and the rule of law is sacrosanct.
I know even a phone call from you asking that any anomalies in the investigation be corrected with a view to fruitful prosecution will suffice. I do not for any moment underestimate the power of your office.
Sir, I believe it is within your power to act to ensure that justice is done in this case. I would appreciate your necessary action.
God bless you.
Sincerely,
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue • Ilford • IG1 3DW
United Kingdom
.........................................................................................................................................................................
General enquiries: 020 7271 2400 Direct line: 020 7271 2492 Fax: 020 7271 2494
e-mail: tim.strevens@islo.x.gsi.gov.uk
THE LEGAL SECRETARIAT TO THE LAW OFFICERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS
9 BUCKINGHAM GATE
LONDON SW1E 6JP
THIS IS A TEXT COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.K.
5th May 2005
Dr. J. A. T. Ovadje
48 Courtland Avenue
Ilford
IG1 3DW
Thank you for your letter of 3rd May addressed to the Attorney General. I have been asked to reply.
I was sorry to read of the attack on yourself which I’m sure must have been a horrific experience for you.
The Attorney General is the principal legal adviser to Government, and as such cannot give legal advice or assistance to individuals. He has no role to play in relation to individual court decisions, save in particular circumstances, which do not apply here (e.g. appeals against sentences thought to be unduly lenient). He has no role to play in relation to charging decisions or the actions of the police or the Courts.
You are plainly unhappy with the way the police handled this case. If you have a complaint against the police, you should take it up with the local force. If you exhaust that process, there is an independent Police Complaints Commission:
Independent Police Complaints Commission
90 High Holborn LONDON WC1V 6BH Tel: 020 7155 3000. Fax: 020 7404 0430
enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Sincerely,
Tim Strevens
Correspondence Unit
posted by jato | 12:03 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home